Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olfen, Stever an der Füchtelner Mühle -- 2016 -- 3939.jpg

File:Olfen, Stever an der Füchtelner Mühle -- 2016 -- 3939.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2017 at 05:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Olfen, Stever an der Füchtelner Mühle -- 2016 -- 3939.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olfen, Stever an der Füchtelner Mühle -- 2016 -- 3939.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
•  Info all by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 05:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 06:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, blown parts but very nice light. You are one of the few who can get away with such bright light. :-) --cart-Talk 09:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Always too much early for me --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Lovely view but on three different screens I see very strange halos around the reflections of the trees in the water, especially on the right side. There are also some pieces of whatever swimming in the water and I see red halos around them. Does anybody else see these? --Code (talk) 07:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• Now that you mention it... yes, you're right. The red halos especially should be taken care of. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
• I'll check (and fix) it. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 09:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Definetly wow --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really don't like the blown areas; they are very obvious and distort the colours near to them -- Thennicke (talk) 10:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
• @Code: Thank you for your hint. CAs are removed with another parameter set. Before the set was wrong and some parts of the blue sky were removed too. BTW: And I improved the blown area too. --XRay ^talk 15:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but per Thennicke. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful image, however, color distortion and blown and  Overexposed areas. I'm sorry --The Photographer 22:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 04:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per The Photographer. — Julian H.^✈ 10:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed --Mile (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
•  weak overexposed - Price Zero|^talk 11:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Center is as white as toothpaste. -- Pofka (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 18:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)