Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old lock 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Old lock 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 May 2009 at 22:29:10
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I read the page from top to bottom and didn't see the other version at first. This is nice, but redundant. I prefer the one below. --Dschwen (talk) 16:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Done Elaborated on description and copied over a geotag from another jail image. —Notyourbroom (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)- Support—Notyourbroom (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Question It is pretty, but is it meant as an alternative to the other one? To me they look identical, save for the cropping, which is allowed as a derivative anyway according to Common's licensing. We are then basically trying to promote two version of the same image which is unfortunately not allowed! Lycaon (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Comment Well, I did not present it as an alternative to the other one nor did I think of it as such. Yes, same subject, but different treatment. It is a close up of a section, a different picture that has another level of texture and abstraction. However, I can see your point. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 11:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - I prefer the one below Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No addition for the one below --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose have to agree with Richard and Alvesgaspar --AngMoKio (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me, but the one below is better indeed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:39, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Richard Bartz. —kallerna™ 16:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Estrilda (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
