Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odle di Funes2.jpg

File:Odle di Funes2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2011 at 12:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Odle di Funes2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odle di Funes2.jpg

•  Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Abstain As editor and nominator. -- Llorenzi (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Info This is a nice image, but it is not perfect. Please make an update with 300 dpi, noise reduction, without vignetting in the corners, without the white lines over the mountains and without the blue and white sun-reflexions on the Sass Rigais. Each image in wikimedia commons needs 300 dpi for printing. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Michael, where is this 300 dpi requirement? My understanding is that the the DPI field in a JPG is irrelevant. Colin (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for this information. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I do not understand the 300 dpi thing either. The overall resolution is OK. --Slaunger (talk) 20:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I eliminate the white sun-reflexions on the Sass Rigais. For the rest I dont know how to do it (i.e. 300 dpi and white lines)--Llorenzi (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Request Please geocode.--Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment My immediate impression is that I do not understand what the informational or educational value is in this photo? I see two mountain peaks sticking out over clouds. Is it taken at very high altitude from the top of a very special mountain? The file description in Italian list some location names, but some links there would have been helpful.... --Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Info I made an update with noise reduction and without vignetting in the corners, without the white lines over the mountains and without the sun-reflexions on the Sass Rigais. I left the 72 dpi. Maybe there is no 300 dpi requirement. The overall resolution is OK like Colin and Slaunger said. I added Category:Fog in Italy. llorenzi, You can replace your version, if you want. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral For now, until geotag is added. - Per ora. Beh, a me piace abbastanza! Ed é anche illustrativa. Solo che non posso vedere dov'é il posto perché ci manca la "geotag". Cioé le coordinate del posto da cui é stata scattata la foto. Cambieró il mio voto a positivo se verranno aggiunte le coordinate nella descrizione (Vedi qualche foto mia ad esempio, quella dei caraibi, per capire come fare la geotag). Le coordinate le puoi trovare mediante google maps in internet. Saluti, --Paolo Costa (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I added geocode from the place where I took the foto. @ Michael, what you mean "You can replace your version"? --Llorenzi (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Llorenzi, in case my update is not better than your update be free to install your own update again. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
    • I think you made a great job. Thanks again.--Llorenzi (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Paolo Costa (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose that's a lot of cloud/mist or whatever and in the end, there's not much to see here. I may have been great to be there, but I don't like too abstract pic. Personal taste oppose. - Benh (talk) 22:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support-- Looking mystery and show the beauty of natural to me. No reason to oppose.Trongphu (talk) 23:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose, too blurry--Sasha Krotov (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)