Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 48.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2014 at 11:10:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Unusual view of the glass roof and the upper cloister from the courtyard of the Episcopal Palace of Teruel, a building of end of the 16th century where is located the Religious Art Museum of the Diocese of Teruel and Albarracín, Teruel, Spain. All by me, Poco2 11:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 11:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support wow. May I ask which lense you used here? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- You can see it in the EXIF data: Canon EF 8–15mm lens, my Christmas gift :) Poco2 11:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Very nice, but I am slightly irritated by the fact that the "cross" is not exactly lining up. Was that deliberate? Or is it just inevitable result of UWA? --DXR (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I am not 100% sure what you meant but I made some improvements of the perspective and hopefully address your irritation. Otherwise, could you please add a note? Poco2 13:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Because straight lines are an illusion :-). It is a shame the grid doesn't line up perfectly but I appreciate it is nearly impossible to get this right in practice without some kind of surveying equipment and/or a lot of fiddling with Lightroom's adjustments. I also like File:Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 42.JPG with the lens at circular fisheye. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Because of the lens distortion, and per DXR, and because of the crop too. My taste is more classical, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Distortion is fine by me but the crop is too tight. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per others Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]Info Alternative with improved crop, better symmetry and some window cleaning. Poco2 13:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Poco2 13:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Lost corners not a big issue imo, rest wonderful --DXR (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Better now. --EveryPicture (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support also fine --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support
this is how alternatives should be presented; same image just a better edit.Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Saffron, this isn't the same image. It was taken at 10mm rather than 11mm and has a different exposure. But I don't have an issue with "alternatives" needing to be from exactly the same negative. -- Colin (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I kind of shot myself in the foot there :-) I still believe what I said, but will make an exception in this case as the differences were sufficiently small to fool me on first inspection. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Saffron, this isn't the same image. It was taken at 10mm rather than 11mm and has a different exposure. But I don't have an issue with "alternatives" needing to be from exactly the same negative. -- Colin (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Better. -- Colin (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Yann (talk) 07:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Maurits Cornelis Diego --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry again, the deformation does not work to me. As I thought first that this ceiling was so in real, I find this image deceptive to the viewer. I find this image very beautiful however.--Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
The chosen alternative is: File:Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 44.jpg