Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg

File:Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2015 at 20:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 20:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 20:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 03:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A bit soft, but clearly a FP for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 20:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support There is some lack of symmetry in the corners, but still FP to me Poco² 08:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because of the lack of symmetry, a mandatory for me in this kind of subjects and composition, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jebulon. --Kadellar (talk) 01:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Don't lack of symmetry is simpled not regular,anyway I preferred show all the window for not cut it,thanks--LivioAndronico talk 09:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 Comment A slight crop on the right and on the top would improve the symmetry. Poco² 09:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Poco²,thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 19:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• This user was blocked by Yann see here , and I'm sorry but I do not consider the vote valid, it has been placed at random.--LivioAndronico talk 12:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

• IMO you cannot do that. Even if there is a link between the vote and the block, the block came after the vote. The vote is valid. Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege.--Jebulon (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

• Jebulon, It's LivioAndronico's nomination so if anyone can remove support votes then he certainly can, and if you are upset with the final result you can re-nominate. LuisArmandoRasteletti's support of 90 candidates in a row is no more a valid vote than if I put an X next to all the candidates in my UK election today. He was just playing games and got blocked for it. No, we don't need rules for everything, a wiki is not a court of law. -- Colin (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

• He had been warned several times Errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum --LivioAndronico talk 15:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors