Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Ulrich II von Ernau 26012016 0361.jpg

File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Ulrich II von Ernau 26012016 0361.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2016 at 13:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Ulrich II von Ernau 26012016 0361.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Ulrich II von Ernau 26012016 0361.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - Given that there is already a Featured picture of the same motif in slightly different light, though without the inscriptions above and below or a part of the floor showing, please explain why this picture is different enough to justify also being featured. Because of the importance of the inscriptions or something else? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Because this image shows the complete epitaph, whereas the already featured picture only unfolds a cut-out with the central relief stone of Ulrich II. von Ernau. So you folks might get an impression of the whole work. If a specific description might be of a common interest, I can hand it in later at request. By the way, this is one of the finest Renaissance relief works in Carinthia, created by the Italian sculptor Martin Pacobello. Thus according to my opinion it is important enough to be nominated as a whole as well. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the explanation. Parts of the picture are a little fuzzy, but the quality is good enough for me.  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting light on this one. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral These shadows on both sides prohibits me from supporting this. Especially right one looks just too disturbing. I like the rest of this picture, so I'll stick with neutral this time. -- Pofka (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 13:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)