Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 005.jpg

File:Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 005.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2018 at 03:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 005.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 005.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Nice photo, but the description is inaccurate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm not too wowed by this, sorry. There's not enough happening and the light is less than perfect.--Peulle (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it, but it seems a bit tilted; makes me a bit unsure. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support per Basile Morin's comment below, not optimal coloring but still OK. I'm starting to like this image. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Reminds me of Cart's buoy photo. Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poetic. I find the subject intriguing. The light and the colors in Cart's buoy were better, but here the object is so particular, like surreal. At first sight, I found the image a little bit tilted too, like GerifalteDelSabana, but it's probably an optical effect as I checked at full size and the pillar appears perfectly vertical in reality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poetic, it makes me feel calm and that I should slow down and sit by a river for a the rest of the day. But please King of Hearts will you fix the description and the name, too? "Birdhouse" or something like that should appear in both description and the name of the file I think. Thanks heaps, --Podzemnik (talk) 02:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, I agree with Ikan and Podzemnik that the description should be more accurate and may strike my support in the next days otherwise -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 11:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle, sorry. --A.Savin 16:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle. --Karelj (talk) 19:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle.--Ermell (talk) 07:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Simple and nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice composition for me. Only I find the bird house too small in the overall picture.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose not enough special Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle, sorry. This is just QI without wow and no more -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)