Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil.jpg

File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2016 at 17:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
•  Info All by -- The Photographer 17:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scene has potential, but the focus seems to be on the junction box (or whatever it is) at the bottom left and the train is well out of the narrow DoF for f/3.2. That plus the high ISO means there is more of an impression of a train than any detail. -- Colin (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @Colin: , please could you try give me a configuration recomendation for this shoot, without tripod in a absolutly darked area and the main subject in movement. --The Photographer 20:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose NR is a bit overaggressive and colors are a little too HDR-like. Great scene though, would make a nice painting. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support not per others, I like it. The picture reflects the specific atmosphere of an underground railway track taking into account the difficult light situation..--Christof46 (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as Christof46 --Ralf Roleček 21:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Obviously you passed some dangerous time for this shot. I dont like banding, but in all i like the shot. --Mile (talk) 07:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 12:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral The focus point seems indeed to be a bit too close, but the idea has potential. The setting reminds me of my own on one of my images, where I wanted to have enough speed for to have the flying birds not to be blurred. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral - I've gone back and forth with this, but I just want to say that I hope you didn't endanger yourself by taking this picture! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Not as dangerous as you think, but you must be aware that the other train is not coming, if the other train coming you should walk quickly to a hole in the wall. --The Photographer 12:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Colin. -- Zcebeci (talk) 15:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support after a lot consideration --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per KOH - way too aggressive noise reduction. Storkk (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

It was a selective noise reduction. --The Photographer 11:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps, but the walls, the ceiling and the floors look way too "mushy" for me. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 17:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer 11:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles