Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mesa Arch, Canyonlands.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mesa Arch, Canyonlands.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2012 at 20:49:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by snowpeak - uploaded by snowpeak - nominated by Till (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Till (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)- Support Great! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Neutral Obviously huge wow and it looks really great in preview. But already at 2Mpixels it begins to look overprocessed with posterized cliffs and chroma noise in the sky. At full res, the problems are very apparent. I had a look at the creators own comment regarding the shot on flickr, where he says "...I worked a lot on it because I forgot to use the tripod and also didn't set the exposure right. Paying for my sins, so to speak. All those other tourists that were there blocking the shot got me all flustered!". It explains why it looks so processed. --Slaunger (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Request A geocode would be helpful and add value to the image page. --Slaunger (talk) 21:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Done Added per [1]. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Slaunger, at full resolution certainly looks a lot over-processed. --Dey.sandip (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)- Oppose Great composition, great moment to choose. Sadly the holes near the top of the arch look dreadful in full resolution. Kleuske (talk) 23:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Slaunger. –Makele-90 (talk) 06:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Just too many flaws. Shame. Colin (talk) 12:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose for the obvious reasons. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The colors and the idea are great, but there are just too many flaws, as already pointed out. Unfortunate. Michael Barera (talk) 21:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Slaunger. --El Grafo (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
