Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mauterner Bridge 4731.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mauterner Bridge 4731.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2013 at 17:49:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Idobi (talk) - uploaded by Idobi (talk) - nominated by -- Idobi (talk)
Support -- Idobi (talk) 17:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)- Support a bit artsy (which could become a problem here), but I like it. Of course it does have encyclopedic value. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment Yes artistic and also tilted and with red CAs --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- SupportWhat's the problem with being artistic, if it has encyclopaedic value and sufficient technical quality? Many a times it feels, that there is too much emphasis on quality (The reference always used for argument is Commons images may be used for high quality printing and other high resolution media purposes). Well, I would like to get some statistics on how many of these FPs are actually being used by People and Establishments in the above-mentioned way. That would help us call a spade, a spade. I think we need a serious revision of the FPC Criteria, nowadays many images with average and no "wow" getting promoted just because there's tons of resolution, taken in broad daylight or used softwares amply to correct every flaws noticed out of pixel-peeping. I tend to get confused with the definition of what is featurable, because in almost all other well-known sites, emphasis is given on photographic creativity. --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment You're right. I just wanted to anticipate criticism that was to be expected, keeping in mind the history of similar images' reviews here in FPC. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
