Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Larus heermanni13.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Larus heermanni13.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2010 at 20:08:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Basar - uploaded by Basar - nominated by Basar -- Basar (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment My major concern was the highlights on his head. The histogram looked ok, but there isn't much detail there. I took some less exposed photographs of the subject, and they indicated there may not be much detail there to start with. -- Basar (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Very good picture for documentary purposes --Pjt56 (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Oppose The approved file name format is with lower case jpg. The file is not in line with basic guidelines, so I think it should fail because of this. Snowmanradio (talk) 18:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- What is wrong with uppercase .JPG ? I think this is a very bad reason to oppose.--Korall (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Both JPG and jpg work, but it is a guideline here to use lower-case; see Commons:First steps/Quality and description. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- It looks like the guidelines state the extension can be spelled jpg or jpeg. I don't see that it says it must be lower case or can't be upper case. Upon review of the featured picture directory, I found a number with capitalized extensions. Does anyone else concur that a capitalized extension is not allowed? Basar (talk) 02:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Of course .JPG is OK. I upload almost all my files like that. This is the first time ever ive heard anyone complaining about that. It could be nice with a geotag or a info about where the file was taken in the file description. --Korall (talk) 02:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
