Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 19:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Panoramic view of the Miscanti lake, altiplano of the Antofagasta Region, northern Chile. The brackish water lake, located in Los Flamencos National Reserve, is separated from Miñiques Lake by a lava flow from an eruption of Miñiques volcano. All by me, Poco2 19:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 19:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Support Beautiful panorama, great colours and very nice composition.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
180* ? You might try some crop. --Mile (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Oppose
- Mile: I really like it the way it is. To me it looks balanced the way it is, still, if other reviewers request it, I can offer an alternative where the road is cropped in both sides Poco2 20:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Poc actually its not so bad, since lake is wide. But you need to fix stiching errors. Its heavy to see it - image. --Mile (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Mile, would you be so kind and enter notes for the stitching errors? I just looked for any and couldn't find anything. Also nobody else of those who reviewed the image seem to have found any. Thank you. Poco2 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Poc i put two notes. Left is more problematic, but right one could be solved. Problem with left - when doing panoramas, especially wider, never put Auto WB, set temperature manually. Or later correct it in RAW into one temperature. --Mile (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for those notes, Mile. I've uploaded a new version. The issue on the left was rather a cloning problem than a WB problem. I checked the WB of all frames and they were very similar, just the last one on the right was a bit colder. Please, let me know what do you think about the last version Poco2 14:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Something better. Removed o. At least you improved mistakes. Some dont. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Support - Gorgeous. I wouldn't propose a crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Support - I like this panorama for several reasons. There's an infinity to it - an allure that makes the eyes scan its depths; a magic that compels one to capture the image. I may well be biased to South America and the magic of the Chilean landscapes, and this photo takes me there. Atsme 📞 22:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Support I also wouldn´t propose a crop. Considering the high resolution the image is of high quality. Of course, the subject is also very grateful.--Milseburg (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Support INeverCry 23:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Support ~ Moheen (talk) 11:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Support − Meiræ 16:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural