Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG

File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 19:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG

983

882

776

2023

31036

5238

strange colors in clous, WB problem ?

22294

1400

414

415

31036

5238

see border of hill

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Panoramic view of the Miscanti lake, altiplano of the Antofagasta Region, northern Chile. The brackish water lake, located in Los Flamencos National Reserve, is separated from Miñiques Lake by a lava flow from an eruption of Miñiques volcano. All by me, Poco² 19:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 19:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful panorama, great colours and very nice composition.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose 180* ? You might try some crop. --Mile (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

• Mile: I really like it the way it is. To me it looks balanced the way it is, still, if other reviewers request it, I can offer an alternative where the road is cropped in both sides Poco² 20:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

• Poc actually its not so bad, since lake is wide. But you need to fix stiching errors. Its heavy to see it - image. --Mile (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Mile, would you be so kind and enter notes for the stitching errors? I just looked for any and couldn't find anything. Also nobody else of those who reviewed the image seem to have found any. Thank you. Poco² 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

• Poc i put two notes. Left is more problematic, but right one could be solved. Problem with left - when doing panoramas, especially wider, never put Auto WB, set temperature manually. Or later correct it in RAW into one temperature. --Mile (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

• Ok, thanks for those notes, Mile. I've uploaded a new version. The issue on the left was rather a cloning problem than a WB problem. I checked the WB of all frames and they were very similar, just the last one on the right was a bit colder. Please, let me know what do you think about the last version Poco² 14:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Something better. Removed o. At least you improved mistakes. Some dont. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support - Gorgeous. I wouldn't propose a crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I like this panorama for several reasons. There's an infinity to it - an allure that makes the eyes scan its depths; a magic that compels one to capture the image. I may well be biased to South America and the magic of the Chilean landscapes, and this photo takes me there. Atsme 📞 22:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I also wouldn´t propose a crop. Considering the high resolution the image is of high quality. Of course, the subject is also very grateful.--Milseburg (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 23:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ~ Moheen ^(talk) 11:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 16:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural