Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kitchen Hut with Cradle Mountain in the background.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kitchen Hut with Cradle Mountain in the background.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2022 at 01:46:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info created by Darreng169 - uploaded by Darreng169 - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 01:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Support I realise the sky is a bit dark, but to me, the dark sky perfectly blends in with the hut. It frequently rains in this park (average precipitation is 2,815.8 millimetres (110.86 in) per year) which reflects the park's harsh reality. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)- Support Impressive. The contrast is quite high (almost black shadows, white highlights), but this works very well with this subject/motif and gives it a great mood. --Aristeas (talk) 06:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The difference in brightness between the hut and the sky looks unnatural. For me, the clouds are too exaggeratedly darkened.--Ermell (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Question That’s an important point. Well, I have assumed that there was a spot of sunlight shining through the clouds which illuminated exactly the hut and the area before it – that seems unlikely, yes, but sometimes such lucky coincidences actually happen. Can anybody find pieces of evidence in the photo which allow either to confirm that there was actually a spot of sunlight or to disprove this, unveiling the contrast in brightness as artificial? --Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Shadows would be visible in sunlight. Ermell (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oops, right – you see how stupid I am that I did not get this myself. Well, it’s a bit difficult to apply that criterion on this photo because there are only small rocks and bushes, but I can actually spot dark shadows at the bushes around the hut. They are small, and I understand your oppose, but they are sufficient for me to assume good intentions and to keep up my support vote :–). --Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Putting the hut right in the middle was obviously intentional but ruins the composition for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support I think it is a bit too contrast-y but the effect is still FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell. -- Karelj (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support but the category should be photoart, dark light around the hut is not natural. -- Ivar (talk) 18:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Weak support -- Wolf im Wald 01:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)- Oppose Striking, but the composition isn't really working for me. I often think it's fine for the main subject to be in the center, but in this case, both the hut and the peak are centered, and that makes the composition more static than I'd like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is clearly overprocessed. If you take a look at the other upload by the same user, the excessive treatments by this photographer is very obvious -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Way too much processing that went into this one. A pity, it's a nice photo otherwise. -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Love the way the craggy mountain enhances the dramatic sky, with the small building in the center representing how little shelter there truly is from unforgiving, indifferent nature (and, metaphorically, life itself). I don't think any of the processing makes this look unnatural ... I have seen both similar scenes in real life (well, haven't we all?) and far worse overprocessing in other images. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
