Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2017 at 22:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Religion
•  Info Nativity of Christ at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Kefermarkt, Upper Austria. Anonymous master (Master of the Kefermarkt Altar), around 1497. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Fröhliche Weihnachten --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 23:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 00:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - Nice, but is it not possible to up the sharpness further? Or perhaps it's the type of dull light that hit it that's tiring my eyes a bit when I look at this photo and that wouldn't be helped by further sharpening. Am I the only one who's affected this way? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
  • No, you're not the only one... Sharpness could be better here, no doubt. I just don't think it's actually bad enough not to support. But any attempt to improve the quality is definetely welcome. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose per my comments above, and also in order to prevent a quick close and extend discussion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 11:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support It is very much three dimensional and taken at 90mm. So I think DOF is acceptable. Jee 06:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 06:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Religion