Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Istanbul asv2021-11 img03 Hemdat Israel Synagogue.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 13:50:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
Info Interior of Hemdat Israel Synagogue, Kadıköy/Istanbul. All by me --A.Savin 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)- Support Excellent, sharp and beautiful interior, despite some small distortions. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Also beautiful and atmospheric light. --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Andrei (talk) 22:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Very interesting room, also with the corona tapes. Resolution and sharpness are outstanding. But the crop isn't. The composition isn't really wowing me. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 16:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)- Oppose Quite honestly, I agree. It's wonderful to see a photo of a synagogue in Istanbul, but the angle doesn't work to me as a great composition for FP. I think this is a really useful VI/QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I think this angle-of-view is emphasising the distortions of a 15mm lens too much. A crop may help. -- Colin (talk) 09:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose A very wow-y room, but as others have pointed out already, the composition doesn't do it justice. It feels to me like you were trying to somehow squeeze in as much of the ceiling as possible, while kind of forgetting about the rest. I get it, the ceiling is beautiful, but from up there you won't get a good view of it anyway. Colin's suggested crop might be able to fix that. --El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452212 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 06:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfavorable composition. But it's probably not easy without assembly of several photos. The cut light at bottom left don't help too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
- Support --A.Savin 11:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support I do still think the other image could work as an FP if it were the top half of a vertorama. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452212 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support I mildly prefer the other one but this is IMO fine for FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice but too tight at bottom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- ⚠️ Not a valid alternative, in my opinion, because too different from the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose + the chandelier is cut. Very tight crop, top and bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- What else should have been there on top, just curious? --A.Savin 03:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Lead room, and same under the chandelier. Space missing IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile and Christian Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
The chosen alternative is: File:Istanbul asv2021-11 img04 Hemdat Israel Synagogue.jpg
