Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Insetinundacio.jpg

File:Insetinundacio.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2012 at 09:08:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Insetinundacio.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Insetinundacio.jpg

•  Info created by Paubahi - uploaded by Paubahi - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dvdgmz (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Davidpar (disc.) 16:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good piece of art, but I do not feel that it illustrates the subject of the flooding of the Mediterranean well. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image fits what is explained in en:Zanclean flood, and as far as I can see there aren't topographical mistakes. Why don't you think it illustrates the subject well?--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
    • The brush strokes look haphazard, and I feel a computer graphic (or at least a more photorealistic painting) would be more appropriate for illustrating an encyclopedic article. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
    •  Comment This work is part of a set of illustrations from the same author about the Messinian Mediterranean salinity crisis. The illustrations were supervised by an expert to avoid scientific errors. I think the image is scientifically rigorous (according to current knowledge) and representationally well solved; but if you think that computer graphics would be more appropriate I can't say anything about it.--Dvdgmz (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. Tomer T (talk) 06:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting subject, but File:Roger Pibernat - landscape - messianic med-1024x768.jpg is a better illustration. Yann (talk) 08:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support the image has been reviewed by an expert and illustrates the subject fairly well.--Arnaugir (talk) 08:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)