Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Houses of Reine by Gravdalsbukta, Moskenes, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 13:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Norway
Info created & uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment Looks very saturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Neutral I was thinking of nominating this image a while back, but had the same concerns as Charles. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 20. April 2023 (UTC)- Support Looks very satisfying.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support Agree about the saturation, but after looking at the photo in full size most colours seem realistic and appropriate in my eyes. The only exception are some small orange buoys, but I guess they have really a very garish colour, so that orange is OK, too. --Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support It would be nice to hear from Ximonic about the saturation and colors, but not having been there, I feel like they are plausible, and it's certainly an amazing view, like many of Ximonic's pictures of Norway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for nomination! The main affecting thing is the warmer white balance compared to normal daylight pictures. This is due to basically everything in the picture being in the shadow, not in sunlight anymore, and being normally blue instead of neutralish. But in my opinion the blue tone picture wouldn't work in this subject very well. I think the Canon produces quite vivid colors to start with. For curiosity, the maximum vibrancy in Camera Raw I use is usually +10 or less from the raw file, I assume it's somewhere between 0–10 here as well. The saturation slider I like to keep somewhere at 0 though. In landscape shots I tend to like the Adobe landscape color profile quite often, then I often pull green a little bit down, because the green seems to get a little saturated sometimes... I think also in this case. I don't remember there being much anything else going on here colorwise. To my eye, it seems okay in "saturation", also in comparison to many quality pictures around, but feel free to disagree. The rest is trying to find balance in light contrasts and brightness. --Ximonic (talk) 13:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support From my own experience photographing in the direct and indirect light of the midnight sun (OK, tbh, not really any different technically from dusk or dawn light save for the direction it comes from and the surreality of reconciling the clock time and the sunlight), this is accurate. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Norway
