Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Honeymoon Bay Sunset.jpg

File:Honeymoon Bay Sunset.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2009 at 10:42:33

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Hopefully 3 is an acceptable level of spam. -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Stunning picture, but IMHO looks too artificial probably due to post-processing. Also, I noticed a lot of chromatic aberration. -- H005 (talk) 11:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Chromatic aberration is unavoidable at wide angles. The lenses able to avoid it cost two good months of salary. →Diti the penguin — 13:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Easy enough to photoshop out if it is a deal breaker Noodle snacks (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Question What are blue particles in the sand?--Mbz1 (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • The saturation was boosted the saturation artificially. This isn't normal practise for my images though. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! Technically not perfect but good enough. - Ukuthenga (talk) 22:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. Although it could get positive feedback from photo magazines, it doesn't present encyclopaedic values enough, to give it a featured status. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the concept - there is a lot of drama which makes me want to support it. But I agree with the comments about the post-processing, and wonder why you went from what seems to be the original 10Mpx to below 3Mpx (if I have calculated correctly). It would be interesting to see this at original resolution, and with a bit less fore-ground sand as a variation. This has a tremendous feeling of drama which makes it stand out from the common crowd. Well done for that. (And the blue particles in the sand look like the sky reflected of something such as shells.) -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)