Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hieflau and Gesäuse from Rotmauer panorama 20210424.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2021 at 11:36:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Styria
- Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The view from Rotmauer is one of the clearest (e.g. with fewest obstructing trees in an area covered mostly by forest) one can get of the Gesäuse mountains from the east. This panorama is high resolution and shows a lot of detail both of the rocks on the mountains as well as the parts of Hieflau visible in the valley. --Domob (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Domob (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Very good, but can you make the verticals of buildings and posts straigth, they look a bit tilted and are leaning out especially at the right. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've compared the picture against a grid, and I can't really see any systematic leaning of verticals. The buildings in particular (everywhere on the picture) look pretty vertical. Some posts are not exactly straight, but I assume that is because they are leaning for real. Do you have any particular building or post in mind that you think needs to be corrected? I'm happy to do so of course. --Domob (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Well, I see some buildings in Hieflau which look a bit tilted, but it is a rather minor issue. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've compared the picture against a grid, and I can't really see any systematic leaning of verticals. The buildings in particular (everywhere on the picture) look pretty vertical. Some posts are not exactly straight, but I assume that is because they are leaning for real. Do you have any particular building or post in mind that you think needs to be corrected? I'm happy to do so of course. --Domob (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support The trees are vertical, as far as I can see --Llez (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Weak support Not very sharp but nice --Commonists 19:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition, and huge resolution. The perspective is fine to me. Top down view, and the subject is not architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support good EV and very high resolution Buidhe (talk) 05:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Qualified support Snow is a bit bright at full-size, but maybe there's nothing you could have done about that. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 08:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Styria