Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green Sea Turtle, by Jeremy Bishop 2016-09-14.jpg

File:Green Sea Turtle, by Jeremy Bishop 2016-09-14.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 19:39:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Green Sea Turtle, by Jeremy Bishop 2016-09-14.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green Sea Turtle, by Jeremy Bishop 2016-09-14.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
•  Info created by Jeremy Bishop, uploaded by Fæ, retouched by W.carter, nominated Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral We are a bit more lenient on underwater photography, but still I think the quality is not quite up to par, with noise visible at large thumbnail size. Very nice composition though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral noise and shallow DOF (f/2.8) Seven Pandas (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

• Seven Pandas, f/2.8 is only shallow DoF on a full-frame sensor. This GoPro camera has a sensor nearly 6 times smaller than that. According to mmcalc this 3mm lens at f/2.8 on a 1/2.3" sensor is equivalent to a 17mm ultra-wide lens at f/16 on a full-frame. Accordingly the camera is actually "focus free" -- it is set so nearly everything from about a foot to infinity is acceptably in focus. -- Colin (talk) 09:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Support clearly better. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I really like it, I'll see if I can do something with it later tonight when I get home, if that's ok. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

• Ok, I've done some gentle fixing. I did it in two steps (noise & sharpness then light), so feel free to revert what you don't like. I think I'll leave it up to others to judge my handiwork. Also 'ping' King of Hearts and Seven Pandas about the change. --Cart (talk) 19:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose, with regret. I like the composition very much and would vote for this if a suitable scope could be found at VI, but I’m not convinced the quality is quite there, even though this is a challenging shot. Cmao20 (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)