Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg

File:Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 13:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg

•  Info Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone National Park. Edited Version. Created, uploaded & nominated by -- Clément Bardot (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Le grain de la photographie est d'une beauté indiscutable. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colors, Poco² 14:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support wow! darkweasel94 14:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
• {{o}} The beauty of the branch in the foreground, however, is quite debatable. Kleuske (talk) 15:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Fbnpch (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose—The dead tree on the right ruins it for me, sorry.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but now the crop messes it up. The edge of the lake is cut off and there are now random treetops poking into the bottom of the image.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment If you edit out the branch I will support. Nice image. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support it's great. Tomer T (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 06:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Kleuske (talk) 07:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Is there really any effort needed to capture this kind of image? Guess, somehow just be there and point at it and shoot. I don't find any kind of compositional inspiration or creativity in this photo. Neither, lighting has anything impressive about it. However, nice eye-catchy colors, definitely ! --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've seen many pictures that capture the subject so much better (e.g. this one, or this). The image shown above lacks composition and doesn't convey the beauty of the place. Sorry. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice place but blurred image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've to agree with Christian, sorry. Definitely lacking detail. --A.Savin 09:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian Ferrer --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but definitely blurred. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice view but poor sharpenss --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support—  ℳ₪Zaplotnik  21:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have to agree with the points named above. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 05:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The first version of the image was great apart from the branch that ruined it. This crop don't capture the beautiful scenery as well as the first version. --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Arcalino (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 11 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 21:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Missing gallery! (see the documentation).