Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glasses 800 edit.png

File:Glasses 800 edit.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2013 at 04:56:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Glasses 800 edit.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glasses 800 edit.png

•  Info created by Boivie - uploaded by Boivie - nominated by Keraunoscopia -- – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 04:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 04:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very realistic reflections and bokeh simulation. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Peter23 (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 11:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per arguments on previous nomination.  B.p. 12:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- This kind of virtual reality has become a little boring. Morever the image and composition are not even beautiful, in my opinion. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose As per Alvesgaspar. A nice photo, but composition fails with the glasses on the sides cut in half. The big problem though is that I see neither wow or value in the photo. As the guidelines state: beautiful does not always mean valuable. --NJR_ZA (talk) 10:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am not familiar with state-of-the-art 3D rendering, but the quality of the result is amazing. The problem is that the composition is VERY unorganized and misses a clear idea. --Tuxyso (talk)
•  Oppose Overexposed background wall, bad crop on the sides. And for a computer generated image, I would expect higher resolution. Yann (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)