Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geranium sanguineum. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg

File:Geranium sanguineum. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2022 at 21:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Geranium sanguineum. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geranium sanguineum. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg

569

1033

408

417

3034

3034

blurry

550

1669

427

493

3034

3034

blurry

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Geraniaceae
•  Info created by and uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful. Maybe somebody will point out that the focus stacking is not totally perfect, but there are no rough transitions and the photo is beautiful, realistic and not oversharpened. --Aristeas (talk) 06:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Re-using this unnatural background does not make for an FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support A perfect example of why less can mean more. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see any reason for FP nomination, low quality subject of image. -- Karelj (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Ugh. --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Question @Karelj: You write "low quality subject of image" as your reason for an oppose vote, but we may have a translation problem. Could you explain in more words please what you mean to say. Do you mean 'No wow' which is commonly used as a reason to oppose (I equate 'No wow' with 'This is a boring picture'), or do you mean something else? Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

• Sorry, this was my mistake, I have copied wrong sentence. Please, forget this my comment. Thanks, -- Karelj (talk) 17:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I like it but there are some blurry areas, I think focus stacking errors (see image notes). -- Wolf im Wald 01:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The color of the artificial background is in my subjective point of view very ugly, and not harmonious with the flower -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good sharpness. The background doesn't ruin the picture IMO. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you for promoting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Geraniaceae