Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GLIB Feeding Young.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:GLIB Feeding Young.png, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
- Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- It has been six days since you stated you would provide more information about your objection to this photo as an FP. You haven't provided any specific concerns about the image, but your statement in opposition is very strongly stated. Your opposition is currently the only one for this nomination. If you are unwilling to elaborate, could you please withdraw your opposition? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
OpposeTalking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)- I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.
- Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Plegadis