Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg

File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2016 at 08:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
•  Info CA correction done. There is a reflextion from plastic cover, which one might think its huge CA. All by me. --Mile (talk) 08:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 08:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Sorry, I'm not feeling this one. I'd probably like the photo better if you showed the entire circle of the fuel gauge. Right now, it feels cut off, with empty space doing nothing for me on the right side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• Ikan Kekek It not full circle, at left in a cm begins clock speed. Right side, black, makes with left white side nice combination. There is no other interesting option, just puting white option isnt so interesting to me. --Mile (talk) 16:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - Noted. I'm not wowed by this picture, but we'll see whether enough other people are. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Superb artistic composition and excellent quality. Had it been a full view of the round meter, it would have been just another good pic of an instrument panel. This makes it an out-of-the-corner-of-your-eye angle as if you were anxiously glancing at the meter while being chased by bad guys in a car movie. cart-Talk 10:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• cart i have full cockpit also, but i wanted to make this for some time, just gasoline gauge. But i found this much more interesting. Good words, they did like it on Flickr also. --Mile (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support per Cart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can't say for sure why this doesn't work for me. Maybe the shapes aren't simple enough. Maybe it's just too ordinary. Maybe it needs to have been a more colorful gauge. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• Daniel, think "Tron". ;) --cart-Talk 23:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I did like that glowy look, but it wasn't dramatic enough, I guess. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral Excellent quality, but I don't have enough wow on this. Maybe good for QI instead? --★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I like the simplicity of this shot; the off-centered composition works for me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - A little small, but it should not be an issue considering the simplicity of the composition. I like the simplicity and the crop. --Pugilist (talk) 20:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles