Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flickr - Ministério da Cultura - Acre, AC (35).jpg

File:Flickr - Ministério da Cultura - Acre, AC (35).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 10:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Flickr - Ministério da Cultura - Acre, AC (35).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flickr - Ministério da Cultura - Acre, AC (35).jpg

•  Info created by Acre, AC / Ministério da Cultura - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Slick (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Source: Flickr, COM:PEOPLE - donna know. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

PS: On that page (just scroll down) is something about "price". Can someone verify whether this picture is really CC-BY 2.0? --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 Info That’s the price of a touristic package; the photo is not the tour agency’s to sell. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Support but only if COM:PEOPLE is cleared.
•  Support is cleared --Böhringer (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Can't resist. Very nice girl and high quality portrait. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Request This file is not used in Wikimedia projects. I hope it will be changed. Przykuta → [edit] 15:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I might have missed something, but this image is on turismo website, which does not seem to me to be associated with cultura.gov.br, the flickr user listed as the source on Commons. Was it accidentally uploaded to flickr with the wrong licence? Another complication is that turismo appears to be giving the credit to Pedro França/Minc/Flickr, and it seems to me that no one with this name on flickr is currently showing this image. The girl was photographed with a Nikon D 700, a different camera to the rest of the flickr user's photographs, a sign of copyright laundering. If this does not have a creative commons licence, then this image should be deleted from Commons. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I think Minc might stand for the culture ministry in the Brazilian government. Are photographs published by the Brazilian government distributed with a licence suitable for Commons? Snowmanradio (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm also concerned about featuring this with so many potential copyright problems. I don't have enough evidence to nominate it for deletion, but it feels very uncomfortable to me, so I must oppose. --99of9 (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support All nice--Miguel Bugallo 11:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Info To the people that have doubts about the copyright of this photo, if they took 3 minutes and spoke portuguese (the language of Brazil), you would noticed that the "Turismo" website(turism in english) is not associated with the brazilian Ministry of Culture but is part of IG website, as that same site states that the photo is taken by Pedro França/Minc/Flickr where Pedro França is the author, as worker (tanking several photos using in several of them a Nikon D700 as seen This image for MINC (that stands for the portuguese "Ministério da Cultura") and also on the Brazilian Ministry of Culture there is a link to the its official flickrsytream from where this image is sourced. Tm (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People