Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eutropis (skink) looking at viewer in the sun in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg

File:Eutropis (skink) looking at viewer in the sun in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2023 at 01:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eutropis (skink) looking at viewer in the sun in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eutropis (skink) looking at viewer in the sun in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Scincidae (Skinks)
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 08:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Beautifil photo, thank you for including a bit if the nature surrounding the animal. You could consider it for the new Animals/In their habitats gallery, but that's up to you. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

• Looking at Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles, they're almost all in their habitat. And I prefer no split -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

• These new galleries are a bad idea Cart. Why were they created? I would recommend deletion (is there are process for this?). We should assume all animal images are of animals in their natural habitat and use sub categories for those that are not e.g. zoos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

• Charlesjsharp , the reasons for creating these new galleries were given at Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#New Gallery pages, please continue this discussion there. With the number of FPs we have now, it is impossible to have FPs in multiple galleries the way we had ten years ago. The structures that were set up when we had some hundreds of FPs don't work with the 17,415 FPs we have today. Instead the FP categories have been enormously improved, like for example Category:Featured pictures of animals. --Cart (talk) 12:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very good quality, but I find the background too distracting. —kallerna (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting background --Wilfredor (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree, the background is not the best, human-made elements are also a minus and I'd rather see a sharp head with the body behind it but not a blurry body in the foreground Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral Blurred tail. ★ 10:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)