Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emmeline Pankhurst, seated (1913).jpg

File:Emmeline Pankhurst, seated (1913).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2016 at 18:49:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Emmeline Pankhurst, seated (1913).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emmeline Pankhurst, seated (1913).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Matzene (Chicago) - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice restoration, but as it is, it is too dark and a bit yellow. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - It looks like a sepia photo to me. The one thing I wonder about is whether it's a good thing to remove the photographer's signature from the image. I know that normally, photos with a signature can't be featured, but this is a historical photo, so I think we could regard it like a painting with a signature, rather than a new photo with a signature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Her head is too close to border for good portrait. --Mile (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not a very difficult restoration, but excellent result. With respect, I strongly disagree with Yann, and don't understand Mile's opposition. Ikan Kekek's comment is very relevant, I tend to agree with him in such cases.--Jebulon (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek and Jebulon: While I normally wouldn't remove it, it was hand-scratched-on in this case, and thus more untidy than most, so I was convinced to over on en-wiki. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Jebulon: Also, this is one of my "break images" from a fiendish picture of Ethel Smyth I've been working on. So much damage.... Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 16:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ------Isasza (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  temporary oppose There is quite some purple-green-ish color noise in the shadow areas – a digitization artifact that shouldn't be there in an analog monochrome image. Otherwise a fine portrait, well-restored → would support if color issues are fixed. --El Grafo (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People