Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eleven metal poles in dusk.jpg

File:Eleven metal poles in dusk.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2015 at 14:07:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eleven metal poles in dusk.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eleven metal poles in dusk.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info Subject location. (And can see 360° what is in the reflections.) c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good idea! I particularly like the varying bands of the different colours. The effect might have been even stronger had the metal poles been polished. They have quite some scratches here and there, what is interesting in one way and maybe a little bit distracting in another, depending on the viewpoint. --Tremonist (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I liked the other one and was sad when you withdrew it. But if that cleared the way for this one, then it was a good thing. Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks Daniel, the other one's quality was too low for an FP but I like that composition and reflection patterns then I will try the same or similar composition of this level quality :) --Laitche (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment IQ much better. But that red part ? I think you should crop above and raise EV. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC) p.S. I wouldn't remove red now, would be sea of gray-black and underexposured.

@Mile: If you have better crop, I don't mind crop and nom an alt, please do so About exposure, this one is a dusk shot then I think this level is normal. --Laitche (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

P.S. This color (red) is a symbol color of this temple. --Laitche (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Level adjustment and new version uploaded. --Laitche (talk) 21:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing of real interest to catch the eye.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 06:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Mile: This brightness is much brighter than real but I think for this kind of photo, that editing is allowed so I raised EV and uploaded new version :) --Laitche (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• I thought about upper crop and actually did first, Even now the main subject is locating upper than center so above crop made unbalanced composition. --Laitche (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• EV is OK, but crop not. I put you derivate, you can put as altenrative. --Mile (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done. I feel of a bit déjà vu... But no problem :) --Laitche (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not as interesting as the previous attempt IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Jebulon, it's ok your oppose, but the concept is totally different from the prev poles photo so cannot compare the two photos, I think... This photo is not aiming interesting at all but the previous was. --Laitche (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Mile's crop. --Laitche (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Not bad. --Laitche (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I go for this. Poles are much more in focus. Colors make good contrast. --Mile (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per my reason above.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  OpposeSame as above.--Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as above. --Tremonist (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Laitche (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)