Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiche-bei-Stuecht--4.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Eiche-bei-Stuecht--4.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 21:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose No wow composition, maybe QI but I can't see nothing special --The Photographer 21:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Support - To me the tree in this light and composition is its own wow. The foreground is more blurry than I usually like, but I just can't pass up supporting such a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak
Support. Foreground bokeh generally does the photo no favors (it would have been better to keep it sharp), but wonderful colors and lighting. Putting the tree right in the middle is a bold move but it works out in this case. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Support impressive --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Support Simple but elegant. I'm impressed you got it sharp despite the gust of wind that is turning all the leaves to the right. --cart-Talk 09:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I do not like the shooting effect of the lawn and the sky.-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 10:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment I think foreground could be also in focus, and should be in panorama - more wide. --Mile (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment There is missing some Quercus-related category. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I see no FP here. It's just a tree and the light appears garishly. --Hockei (talk) 17:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Neutral Sort of a this halo left around the tree, visible on upper branches, possibly from processing. Can something be done about this? Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ermell (talk) 06:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Question - Why did you withdraw, with 6 supporting votes, 3 opposing votes and 1 neutral vote? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: