Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EF4 damage to a duplex in Rolling Fork.jpg

File:EF4 damage to a duplex in Rolling Fork.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 08:06:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:EF4 damage to a duplex in Rolling Fork.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EF4 damage to a duplex in Rolling Fork.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
•  Info created by the National Weather Service - uploaded by Nicholas Krasznavolgyi - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- High-quality damage picture from the strongest tornado since 2015 (2023 Rolling Fork—Silver City EF4 tornado on Wikipedia). Damage picture was featured on Wikipedia’s ITN for 6 days (March 28 to April 2). WeatherWriter (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Not a beautiful picture, but a high quality image of importance. --Kritzolina (talk) 10:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

  If I may ask, what is this page for and why am I included in it? Besides the fact I uploaded the image. I'm a little confused. Nicholas Krasznavolgyi (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

  This image is nominated as one of the best images on this site. We are currently discussin, if it is. You are mentioned, because you brought this image to Commons and you should know about this discussion. If you want, you can vote on it. Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good documentation and should probably be nominated at COM:VIC, but not an FP to me with that blotchy sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose We have lots of US government PD images of tornado-damaged structures. This one really doesn't stand out from them to me. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

 Comment I will note, the only actually featured image of tornado-damage is File:FEMA - 44359 - Oklahoma tornado destroyed home.jpg. WeatherWriter (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

• That file has a better composition and higher photo quality to me eyes, although it's 13 years older. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

  +1 Daniel Case (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Whether they have made it to FP is, to me, besides the point. Some, of course, can't because splendid images though they may be, they're not up to our current technical standards and lack sufficient historic value to overcome that. And, of course, images can only make it to FP if someone nominates them. Daniel Case (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)