Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durga Puja Preparations.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Durga Puja Preparations.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2012 at 16:46:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created/uploaded/nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)- Support --Cyrfaw (Talk) 07:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Personally I do not like this picture. --Llorenzi (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but will you be kind enough to explain the reasons for not liking ? Objective feedback will be more useful to me --Dey.sandip (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- May if only the "statue" in the backgroud was highlighted... I ll vote for the picture, but in this case it seems very distracting what happens in the foregroud.--Llorenzi (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- The background statue is the idol of Goddess Durga. The activities in the foreground show the preparations of a "Puja" and is an essential element of the photo. The people are priests. The intention was to include the activities to give a sense of the puja preparations. The idol is still highlighted with directional yellow light. --Dey.sandip (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- May if only the "statue" in the backgroud was highlighted... I ll vote for the picture, but in this case it seems very distracting what happens in the foregroud.--Llorenzi (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but will you be kind enough to explain the reasons for not liking ? Objective feedback will be more useful to me --Dey.sandip (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Comment This image could use a bit of perspective correction. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have a tool for Perspective correction, neither I have any experience in fixing perspective. If you or anyone else wants to do this, you are welcome to post a new version :) --Dey.sandip (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- You can download The Gimp free of charge. Kleuske (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have a tool for Perspective correction, neither I have any experience in fixing perspective. If you or anyone else wants to do this, you are welcome to post a new version :) --Dey.sandip (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment As it's an interesting picture, I did try to correct the perspective but the crop is too tight, we lose a lot of elements doing it. --Selbymay (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for trying the Perspective correction. This photo was shot using a ultra-wide lens from a very tight spot to accomodate all of the foreground elements. Hence the presence perspective which I personally don't find much of a problem --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Not enough "wow" factor for me. Michael Barera (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the assessment --Dey.sandip (talk) 09:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
