Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2023 -- 8951.jpg

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2023 -- 8951.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2023 at 15:31:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2023 -- 8951.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2023 -- 8951.jpg

1120

14

4522

4438

6720

4480

Suggested square crop. --Cart (talk) 13:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 15:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 15:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good picture but no wow. ★ 16:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per ArionStar. 20 upper 18:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice photo. But is this architecture? It's just an old chain. Maybe you should put it in Commons:Featured pictures/Objects. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

• It's a chain for opening the door of the bunker. --XRay 💬 18:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support I see a lot of symbolism in this – not often do you see a picture-perfect chain with a meticulously-placed shadow. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per SHB2000. --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too busy. Both sides are distracting. Asymmetrical shadow at the left is distracting too. Most of the subject is in the darkness. The chain itself is not particularly exciting. Sorry, not working as a minimalist composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment In this, I partially agree with Basile. I think you would get a nice, cleaner, minimalistic image if you made a square crop and got rid of the "extra fluff" left and right, and concentrate on the abstract essentials. See note. --Cart (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support But I think Cart's suggestion will benefit the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ultimately, it's just a chain with a background - well-shot and perfectly good but not amazing or exciting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)