Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cub polar bear is nursing 2.OGG

File:Cub polar bear is nursing 2.OGG, not featured

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2009 at 22:07:55

•  Info The video was taken in w:Churchill, Manitoba
•  Info created by mbz1 -edited and uploaded by Dhatfield - nominated by mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Aaaaw! =3 →Diti the penguin — 23:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Camera shake. Adambro (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Adambro, I thought that you'll be glad to find out that instead of disrupting Commons, I at last started doing something useful. I have hoped you will support my efforts  :) Just kidding. Thank you the the interest in my video and for your vote.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

• More  Info May I please tell you a little bit more about taking of the video? I had my film Canon SLR in one hand and my video camera in other. It was bitterly cold, and the tundra buggy the video was taken from was shaking. Of course I do realize that only the end result matters.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

• The camera shake is not that bad, and it could be removed entirely with a bit of post-processing. I believe you can do that with ALE (Anti Lamenessing Engine, http://auricle.dyndns.org/ALE/ ). --Dschwen (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for watching the video and for the kind comment, Daniel. I'm ashamed of myself, but I have to ad admit that I have not a slightest idea how to download this video back to my computer. So, I guess I've no choice except letting it go as it is.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

The postprocessing should be performed on the original video data. You don't have that anymore? --Dschwen (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Then it is probabably impossible because the video was edited by user:Dhatfield and he/she did a great job with my original. If I'm to edit my original now, it will look much worse than the nominated one. Thank you for taking your time to comment, Daniel.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I agree, he did do a pretty good job. Did he have the original material though. or did he work with the version you uploaded. Anyhow this is probably a moot point, as I just saw in the linked nomination, that this video was already voted on and supported. Why renoninate? --Dschwen (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

He worked with the version I uploaded as I recal, but I am not positive. This video was supported on English Wikipedia. I believed it is OK to nominate it on Commons. I'm sorry, if I've done something wrong.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops, pardon me. I didn't notice the link went over to en. --Dschwen (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Pom² (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)