Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (14).jpg/2

File:ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (14).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2016 at 21:45:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (14).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (14).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I think this photo of a wrecked fortification of the Franco-Prussian War is poetic and remarkable, as the viewer really feels that they are inside of that desolate space when viewing. It was previously nominated by ComputerHotline on 3 March 2010 and got no votes or comments whatsoever, which I find extremely strange. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• Please help. I'm not sure what I did wrong in editing this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• Nevermind - seems to be OK now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• It seems that you have encountered a problem with the template's substitution, because the picture was unsuccessfully nominated for FP in 2010 (see this). I manually edited the page to put the nomination in order but we still need clarification if a single picture can be nominated again after a failed attempt.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Ikan It isn't fixed. This page needs reverted back to 2010 and a new nomination with /2 on the end created. -- Colin (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Do I need to do anything other than add /2 to the title? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

It didn't work to just put /2 at the end of the title. Please advise in more detail. Thanks a lot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

To be precise, I got an edit conflict with the old nomination I had just reverted to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support My support worked...I hope... lNeverCry 01:07, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is certainly a valuable image of important historical place but it doesn't work to me for an FA, because 1) there is obvious perspective distortion, 2) the composition is not the most interesting of the place (for example, the composition of this, this and this is more featurable) 2) there is an overexposed area on the right side caused by the sunlight reflection, and 3) the litter, especially the plastic bottle, on the ground is just too distracting.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - Your arguments are well-stated, and I certainly understand them, but I disagree with all of them, probably even the overexposure point. Maybe just a bit, but in the context of the whole, not only do I find it perfectly acceptable, but I hardly notice it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not feeling wowed by this. -- Colin (talk) 08:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me. --Karelj (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 07:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)