Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clanculus pharaonius 01.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Clanculus pharaonius 01.JPG, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2015 at 07:29:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)- Support Yann (talk) 09:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 10:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Code (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Baresi F (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Amazing patterns of nature. Very beautiful. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Wow! I am fascinated with this picture! Maybe I will be trivial, but Llez's images are really valuable for the Wiki project and authentic pieces of art! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support agree with Jacopo Werther. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 13:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ximonic (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support // Martin K. (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Oppose
Done Thanks, I agree with your comment, at least with the second part. The top middle specimen is replaced --Llez (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes fortunately we share different opinions for some points :) Unfortunately, now the WB isn't on par with the other views, it looks a bit more blueish. For some reason, it looks to have affected the upper rightmost shell. Arguably a minor issue, but which ruins the consistency it had before. Also, the NR treatment isn't the same, there's more noise on the new view. But I still see this as an improvement. - Benh (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- You look to have fixed the issues I mentioned. So I remove my oppose. - Benh (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks, yes I made some improvements an some new shots --Llez (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. You did the fix even though you needn't to have the picture promoted. - Benh (talk) 09:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks, yes I made some improvements an some new shots --Llez (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- You look to have fixed the issues I mentioned. So I remove my oppose. - Benh (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes fortunately we share different opinions for some points :) Unfortunately, now the WB isn't on par with the other views, it looks a bit more blueish. For some reason, it looks to have affected the upper rightmost shell. Arguably a minor issue, but which ruins the consistency it had before. Also, the NR treatment isn't the same, there's more noise on the new view. But I still see this as an improvement. - Benh (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 08:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones,_shells_and_fossils
