Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg

File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 22:04:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
•  Info created by Scewing - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Not yet opened at full size but please fix the caption ("In this 2015 discussion you requested to retouch a little bit this awesome image... and here it is, just bettered (and even better categorized on Commons). Now the images are more continous, with quite the same lvl of light. What do you think about this new version?") No idea where this text comes from -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Basile Morin Oh yes, of course.

  I thought that the section “description” was to present the image here as a candidate, not the description for the image itself. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Too big to be opened. ★ 22:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

  @ArionStar Mmh… I could take off a little bit of quality in order to lessen the file size, and then upload it on a different file page.

  For now let’s concentrate on the img itself and the adjustments made on it. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support, I prefer the larger file as you can view smaller versions if it's too big, and zooming in to the full version lets you see some super cool things, like people in different areas of the panorama. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

  Yup, a little bit “sizey”, but definitely worth it. :D LucaLindholm (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Ever if need a massive restored version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a nice concept. And I liked seeing this. This should be promoted as VI. But the image is a badly / or not even stacked panorama. Doing this today and calling in panorama would not get any support. Additionally the individual frames are in poor condition and not well restored. --August (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per August. --Milseburg (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)