Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg

File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2015 at 03:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by AntoninsFR - uploaded by AntoninsFR - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - In addition to this being a nice picture of Notre Dame, I like the detail in the view of the stone wall of the Île de la Cité's riverbank. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Slightly tilted ccw! I will support after correction. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Thank Uoaei1!--Paris 16 (talk) 06:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Love the interplay between the blue and gold on the water surface. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 20:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would've preferred to have the composition include the whole right bottom side of the church and less of the bridge at left. Also, the walkway at bottom right with the bars/rails isn't particularly attractive, the water is disturbed rather than reflective, and the sky is very plain and boring. No wow factor at all for me. INeverCry 22:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice light, but bad crop at right. An important architectural part is missing. Looks like if you crop out and edge of the Great Pyramide.--Jebulon (talk) 19:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC) + vignetting + bridge and padlocks unsharp.--Jebulon (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Good point about the crop. AntoninsFR, does your raw file allow for a crop that includes the whole of the flying buttress that you cut off? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment - This is the full picture, uncropped. I also took landscape picture of this seen : there is nothing else but trees and haussmanian buildings. btw, i've seen someone stating it is tilted : if u check carefully the original picture, bridge is ok, but the tower isn't. (and adjusting the picture as it was done by some user removed a bit of a the right... you can check history) --AntoninsFR (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice light and composiion, CAs especially in shadows but acceptable for me. --Laitche (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 23:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment there is nothing else but trees and haussmanian buildings. Not true. A pinnacle of a flying butress is cropped out for part.--Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the light, but bad crop... Yann (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. The crop on both sides seems constrained by the lens rather than what one would choose. -- Colin (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings