Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cataract Creek, Mount Tamalpais State Park (February 2019).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2019 at 11:40:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Great motif, really well done! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 00:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best image of moss, and not the best image of the stream. I do not see why this photo should be the best. JukoFF
- "[…] not the best image of the stream" – which other picture of Cataract Creek are you referring to? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice scene and nice colors, but something about the composition seems off to me; it's not quite balanced. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The dark heavy beam at the top is like obstructing the view. While the most interesting part is in my opinion the stream at the bottom, it is cut too tight. We want to see more of this water going out. I find the long exposure successful, but not the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I included the fallen redwood tree on purpose, as it's one of the characteristics of the creek. Unlike in most parts of Western Europe, forests here in Northern California are being left alone and look much more natural (without forest management cleaning everything up within a couple of weeks) than e.g. in Germany. Now, with regard to the "obstruction", I composed the image on purpose like that. To me, it evokes the question "Hey, what's behind that corner?" (which, for me, as someone who lives here, is what I'm asking myself all the time when I saunter through old redwood groves) – but in the end, it comes down to a matter of taste and I certainly respect your view of the matter. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I like your alternative below -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I included the fallen redwood tree on purpose, as it's one of the characteristics of the creek. Unlike in most parts of Western Europe, forests here in Northern California are being left alone and look much more natural (without forest management cleaning everything up within a couple of weeks) than e.g. in Germany. Now, with regard to the "obstruction", I composed the image on purpose like that. To me, it evokes the question "Hey, what's behind that corner?" (which, for me, as someone who lives here, is what I'm asking myself all the time when I saunter through old redwood groves) – but in the end, it comes down to a matter of taste and I certainly respect your view of the matter. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - For what it's worth, I really disagree with the opposers. I like this version much better. And it's precisely the tree trunk that differentiates this from many other photos of streams and is such a satisfying thing to see at the top of the picture frame. The other version just doesn't have the same satisfying alternation of lights and darks, and most of the moss is cut from the trunk. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- And for what it's worth also, I really disagree with the supporters ;-) The composition of this version is too static for a stream with moving water. Here it seems to be only one subject, the rock with moss on the right, which is not captivating enough to be a whole. Unfortunately the eyes are drained to this part with no exit. I don't find the moss essential at the top, it looks more like a heavy and huge stop your way. At the bottom, the image seems sectioned, as if something was missing. We need this restful area after the fall -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support both alternatives are good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 06:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Comment @Basile Morin: I get your point about the balance, though. So, here's another version with more water in the foreground and less tree… --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Yes, this version is much better in my opinion, the composition is clearly improved due to these two reciprocal lines starting from the top and bottom corners at the left, making like a symmetry with a horizontal axis in the middle, where the sight is lead. Pleasant balance now. And the stream is also better. Nice shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support I like this version better. I like that you can see more of the stream. Also, a piece of light in the back, where my eyes focused first, is a whole, enclosed element. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support both alternatives are good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support I like this better. --Basotxerri (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that's it! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 06:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I'm liking this version more and consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 09:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California
The chosen alternative is: File:Cataract Creek, Mount Tamalpais State Park (February 2019)-3444.jpg