Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem geranium pratense 'Galactic'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 04:29:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Geraniaceae
- Info Flower of a Geranium pratense 'Galactic' Focus stack of 43 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment On Helicon Focus, have you tried to use a lower radius (4 or less)? It might help in reducing the blurry areas around the stamen. Sometimes a lower radius creates halos around the flower, though. When that happens I often use the 'Use other output as source' option in the 'Retouching' tab to combine to combine the best bits of a high-radius stack and a low-radius one. --Julesvernex2 (talk)
- @Julesvernex2: Thanks for your reply. By default I use -B, Radius 8, Smoothing 4- But tonight I will try your advice and upload the possible improved version. Yours sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I just checked what I use: Depth map (B) Radius 8, Smoothing 4. I never change it. You have to go through each image cloning in the background where it is in focus then manually complete in Photoshop/Lightroom using the cloning tool. It is time-consuming. I've given up pointing out the ubiquitous stacking errors. Some voters don't seem to mind. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- And you have to do the same for the background otherwise you get these sort of halos/patterns. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're throwing away a lot of what Helicon can do by sticking to the default settings and going straight to cloning. Here's the workflow I found most effective so far: 1) make several outputs with different settings (usually method B with a 4 to 20 radius, but sometimes also method C); 2) combine the best features of each output (with the 'Use other output as source' option mentioned above); 3) clean up the background by sourcing it from a single frame (usually Helicon sources it from multiple frames, messing up the bokeh); 4) clone any lingering errors (sometimes within Helicon, but most often using Photoshop's better tools) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Doesn't the image still have all the stacking errors around the stamen. (I think I'm looking at the latest version). 20:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You may need to refresh the page.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did. See below. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- And you have to do the same for the background otherwise you get these sort of halos/patterns. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Half-shadow is there, so you cant do much just with settings. You have to cover it manually. --Mile (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Manual editing performed. Thanks for your comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Better, but there's still blurry bits around the stamen and the half-shadows Mile mentioned, I added notes --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: I think the problems you mentioned are solved. Thanks for the explanation.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Manual editing performed. Thanks for your comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment@Famberhorst I think worst part is solved (yellow petals) but there is stil square "cloning issue", brush tool is very visible, similar on top leave arounded. --Mile (talk) 18:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Thanks for your comment. Could you please make a note? Due to the translation I don't know what you mean exactly.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I added 3 sqaures-notes. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: I have (hopefully) fixed the errors you mentioned. You have very good eyes. Thanks for your notes.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I made some comsetical changes, fine with me. --Mile (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC) p.S. You can revert is not ok.
- Thank you for your positive advices.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- The fixes made by Mile are a significant improvement - each nomination needs this kind of attention to detail. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and very very good now – thank you all for your cooperation to improve the image! – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants #Family : Geraniaceae