Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barbier, Jules, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Barbier, Jules, Nadar, Gallica.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2019 at 14:25:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Nadar, restored and uploaded by Jebulon, nominated by Yann (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Yann (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)- Support -- 🇪🅰〒©🇭🅰- 💬 14:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support But it is a bit unsharp and noise IMHO but I think is the best for this kind of restorations Ezarateesteban 18:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --b00+h$!f+ 21:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment There's a blurry blob left of the waistcoat button (not in the original) that bothers me; otherwise this is excellent work. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)- Support --Llez (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I'd like an explanation of why this is an FP, because I'm really not getting why photos with this much unsharpness are FPs. It would have been possible to have a greater depth of field so that the right side (viewer's left) of his face was more focused, correct? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is very old image, and the restoration is very good. The image quality is quite good for that time, the composition is also good, and the expression is interesting. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I just don't find the quality that good even for a historical photograph. DoF is really shallow - I know it's an old photo, but eg. this image from the same period has a deeper DoF so it seems like it was possible to do that even with their cameras. I'm not an expert on restoration but I see some hair (like on a collar) and white pixels (like on a mustache). Shouldn't those be fixed, too? --Podzemnik (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment thanks Yann for nomination, and voters for interest.--Jebulon (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People
