Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avoriaz (5).jpg

File:Avoriaz (5).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2020 at 11:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Avoriaz (5).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avoriaz (5).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support We've seen sharper shots, but this is a really big single shot and it looks very good from close range at 70%. Striking motif and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support and regarding the sharpness I don't think it's a fault in the photo itself. The detail is all there, it's just as if not very much sharpening has been applied from RAW. But that's OK. Undersharpened is always better than oversharpened. Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Cmao20 there is room (and need) for sharpening --Poco a poco (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support without reservations — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20/Poco; a little bit more (careful!) sharpening etc. could improve it further. --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Overprocessed Too much clarity, unnatural light, software's buttons have gone too far here -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose after 5 days -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Due to the blurring at the seam on the right frame, this is unfortunately no FP for me. --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. Also not sharp enough details. StellarHalo (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 19:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really like that image, but some blurry areas ... Kruusamägi (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)