Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek).jpg

File:Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2015 at 18:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment What is this?... Would you please add the English description? --Laitche (talk) 23:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

  ups, sorry, I forgot --Pudelek (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Forgot!? hahaha, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 07:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Um? you mean forgot the description? No I mean that thing which looks like a hatch on the water? What is that one? --Laitche (talk) 15:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Yes, description ;) I'm not sure what it is, mayby object for the water skiing --Pudelek (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  OK, maybe a jump stand for water skiing, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  Laitche, it is, have the buoys, and all that... Pudelek, you should add this information on the description. -- RTA 12:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

  I add information in image note --Pudelek (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roleček 19:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support but vignetting at the top. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow in the composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Quite ok. --Tremonist (talk) 14:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info cropped version --Pudelek (talk) 09:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I prefer the former version. --Tremonist (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice mood, but composition is too ordinary to get this to FP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Better, but still a bit ordinary. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)