Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atelopus limosus female 02.jpg

File:Atelopus limosus female 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 10:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Atelopus limosus female 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atelopus limosus female 02.jpg

•  Info created by Brian Gratwicke - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 10:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 10:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support cute :-D PierreSelim (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 12:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support nice frog!Trongphu (talk) 23:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nice and detailed image of an endangered species with very limited habitat range. The male is interesting as well. --ELEKHH^T 08:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry guys but the image quality is not there: flat lighting, unsharpness and lack of detail (Exif is missing). A very good candidate to VI though. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • It can't be VI because of lack of geocoding. Tomer T (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose same as here. Harsh lighting, strong shadow and overall not the quality. Sorry... --mathias K 19:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Alves + Mathias. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose a good quality picture... but the the lighting is not good enough for FP, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Cayambe. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians