Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Artist's impression of an ultra-short-period planet.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 16:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA, ESA and A. Schaller, uploaded by Stas1995, nominated by Yann (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)- Info Artist's impression of SWEEPS-10, the planet with the shortest orbital period yet found. It is 1.6 times the mass of Jupiter and completes an orbit of its star in just 10 hours. It orbits the star SWEEPS J175902.00−291323.7 located in the Galactic bulge at a distance of approximately 22,000 light years from Earth. It is also the hotest known planet, with approximately 1650 degrees Celsius.
Support This is a nice artisitic work with high EV. -- Yann (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Oppose "artist impressions" are maybe pretty but dangerous in scientific matters, especially in a media repository for an on-line encyclopedy.--Jebulon (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon, this is made by scientists from NASA and ESA, so do you contest that NASA and ESA are not able to faithfully represent what they know? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yann, quote from the file description page : This illustration presents a purely speculative view of what such a "hot Jupiter" might look like. (Emphasized by me). Regards.--Jebulon (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon: It is speculative, as nobody was able to go there, and will ever be. However, this is a representation from the people who know best about this subject, and it is a recent discovery, that's why it has a high educational value. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yann, no need to try to convince me about your own feeling ! Of course you trust it has a FP potential: you nominated it ! I just disagree...--Jebulon (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe not trying to convince you, but to make clear that this is everything but "dangerous for scientific matters". - Benh (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Why ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon: It is speculative, as nobody was able to go there, and will ever be. However, this is a representation from the people who know best about this subject, and it is a recent discovery, that's why it has a high educational value. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yann, quote from the file description page : This illustration presents a purely speculative view of what such a "hot Jupiter" might look like. (Emphasized by me). Regards.--Jebulon (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon, this is made by scientists from NASA and ESA, so do you contest that NASA and ESA are not able to faithfully represent what they know? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yann, Sorry, as you already said, a discussion is a good way to "kill" a nomination, this was not my intention of course, but you understand maybe now why I don't nominate anymore for now. FPC is getting more and more a farce...--Jebulon (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support High EV and good quality. --★Poké95 05:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Comment This is the one which should be used PNG or TIFF (uncompressed format) cause the subject is posterized by jpeg compression. --Laitche (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)- Oppose per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. - Benh (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy
