Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:An air-cushioned landing craft transports Marine Corps equipment.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2021 at 22:11:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Other
Info created by Gwyneth Vandevender - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ✉ 22:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Support --ToprakM ✉ 22:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Domob (talk) 05:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Has wow, but I'm not OK with the pixelated sky in the background and might oppose if necessary. Could that sky be smoothed out, please? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)- Comment And please correct the horizon, it is sloping (or cut it off) --Llez (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced; 30 MPx on 1,3 MB. File compresion was huge, made much mistakes - banding. Its tilted too, crop could be beter - more to botom, without sky. --Mile (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)- Oppose -- As Mile, poor image quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Posterization and more quality issues. Please upload the uncompressed image. --XRay 💬 10:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Terrible quality with blocky JPG artefacts. This was just 812 KB originally (the 1.3MB version seems to be a user adjustment to make it darker for some reason). -- Colin (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others above. --Yann (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality issues per others, plus tilted horizon – no sorry. Crop should be a bit wider to shift the boat out of center – centered compositions always look static. --Kreuzschnabel 12:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive shot but ruined by the aggressive JPEG compression. Cmao20 (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, It is time to withdraw this nomination. There have been no new support !votes in three days, and the opposes now so outnumber the supports that it is extremely unlikely at this point that the image will be promoted Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)--->
- @Daniel Case: concerning the template {{FPX}}, the guidelines state "The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator". And here there are 4 supports. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK, fine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
