Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpine chough on Veliki Vrh, Karawanks, Slovenia 10.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Alpine chough on Veliki Vrh, Karawanks, Slovenia 10.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2019 at 20:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info All by me. It's alpine chough in its natural environment - on top of Veliki Vrh (2060m), Slovenia. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Abstain as author. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Question It looked too soft when viewing at 100 % and then I noticed that the previous verson had more sharpening, to my eye to an appropriate amount. As it is I can't support this "less sharpening" version. – LucasT 21:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Lucas You reckon that the previous amount of sharpening was better? I tend to sharpen less as I'm trying to avoid these bright lines around subjects from oversharpening. But you're probably right that this time it wasn't that bad - I uploaded a new version with more sharpening. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 05:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik thanks, it's much better now and I don't see any artifacts. Bright lines can be mitigated by adjusting the settings, there are many guides on the internet about unsharpen mask and other techniques and how to handle them, in various programs. – Lucas 16:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Lucas Silly me, it's as simple as masking! Thanks for the advice, --Podzemnik (talk) 17:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik thanks, it's much better now and I don't see any artifacts. Bright lines can be mitigated by adjusting the settings, there are many guides on the internet about unsharpen mask and other techniques and how to handle them, in various programs. – Lucas 16:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Lucas You reckon that the previous amount of sharpening was better? I tend to sharpen less as I'm trying to avoid these bright lines around subjects from oversharpening. But you're probably right that this time it wasn't that bad - I uploaded a new version with more sharpening. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 05:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose for the lighting, leaving most of the bird in shadow. --Charles (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)- Oppose per Charlesjsharp --Fischer.H (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. I have to agree that a black bird photographed in shadow is not optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Alright, thank you for your time, I'll capture it better next time :) Cheers, Podzemnik (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 07:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
