Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:34th Street station August 2017 01.jpg

File:34th Street station August 2017 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2018 at 12:20:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:34th Street station August 2017 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:34th Street station August 2017 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created by ArildV - uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Basotxerri -- Basotxerri (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment As seen at QIC. I like the vanishing point and impression of motion. --Basotxerri (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support PumpkinSky talk 16:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, it is a nice vanishing point, but for this to get wow-y, it needs a lot more contrast and clarity. Converting a photo to good B&W is a bit more that just clicking on 'remove color', you have to edit it after that too since we look at B&W in a different way than color photos. --cart-Talk 22:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Anyone who's passed through the Hudson Yards station since it was opened a couple of years ago has recognized how photogenic it is (I have some I haven't processed yet) compared to other New York subway stops; while I think cart has some good points I am OK with what we have now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for nomination, votes and comments. I made a small adjustment of the images.--ArildV (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

• You're welcome! --Basotxerri (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

• weak  Oppose Really nice... but unbalanced (left stairs) :( - Benh (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

 Comment The station has four elevators so you can not get a centered composition.--ArildV (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 04:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral, leaning weak oppose - I liked this as a thumbnail, but at full size I struggle with the noise and sharpness in some areas. Kind of wish the focus were a little higher up, and that you had asked the person in the background to wait just a minute before getting on the escalator :) ). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I don't mind the man, but otherwise, good but not great, IMO, per Rhododendrites. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not liking it being off-centre, the man at the top and too much is blurred. -- Colin (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose the quality ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination A pity, it seems that it's not as good as I thought. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm going to let the nomination active until the nomination ends by time. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose It wants perfect symmetry. Very close but no cigar. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)