Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-12-21 19-13-03 lumieres-noel-montbeliard.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2016 at 02:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lumières de Noël, à Montbéliard/Christmas lights in Montbéliard
I believe French copyright is opt-out, so like American works the lighting designs are copyrighted by virtue of their creation. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • With French FoP it depends on whether or not the display is above COM:TOO. This image is of a structure/set-up with a high degree of originality. I've filed a deletion request. lNeverCry 03:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment On the other hand, for this photo, one may plausibly consider it a larger depiction of the street, in which it is unavoidable to contain some copyrighted elements. In that case, we don't have to delete it --- for example, see the Louvre pyramid example in Commons:De minimis. But I'll leave the decision of whether this can be considered de minimis to others. dllu (t,c) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Daniel Case, in the Eiffel Tower, it is not the light which is copyrighted, but a show. There is no copyright on light in France. There may be a copyright on design though. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, do you think I should unwithdraw? On an artistic basis, I definitely think this is a featurable picture, and it appears that a consensus agrees. If there's a real question about whether this photo could be OK under French law as interpreted by Commons, I would unwithdraw. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure actually. There are very few real court cases about stuff like this. Probably people give some €€€ rather than going to court. On one hand we have copyright on design, including some modern chairs, on the other hand, there are 2 court cases with clear exceptions where copyrighted items are "unavoidable" while taking pictures in the public place. One single garland is certainly OK, but a whole street with a coordinated setup... Regards, Yann (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 22:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]