Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010 Utah State Capitol Salt Lake City.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2010 Utah State Capitol Salt Lake City.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 07:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pocksuppet1999 - uploaded by Pocksuppet1999 - nominated by Pocksuppet1999 -- Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Support- You don't have enough edits to vote. 50 edits are necessary Yann (talk) 07:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Not very sharp, loads of uninteresting detail (like cars) and not enough subject. Kleuske (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)- Oppose: Just not enough subject. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Loads of detail? Not very sharp? Which is it? Follow the lines in the "uninteresting" and "not enough subject" parts. What do they lead to? Clouds, mountains, cars, leaves - they all lead to the subject. These are principles taught in the first day of art classes... Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- The word "details" has two senses: 1) objects; 2) clarity. Kleuske is saying that there are objects that affect the composition negatively, such as cars. It is not being used in the sense that the image is too clear. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Loads of detail? Not very sharp? Which is it? Follow the lines in the "uninteresting" and "not enough subject" parts. What do they lead to? Clouds, mountains, cars, leaves - they all lead to the subject. These are principles taught in the first day of art classes... Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Obvious stitching error on left part of the building (Stitching doesn't seem to be taught in art classes ;-) ). Strange placement of the main subject also, and very poor quality. - Benh (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment Due to the distortion, the perspective is a bit strange, but that makes it interesting imo. I also like the composition, how clouds, tree, cars etc. are quite nice arranged around the center. Unfortunately, it is too blurry, so there is at least a technical issue preventing a positive vote from me. So don't be discouraged, in general, that's a nice pic.--Taraxacum (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
